background image
Search My Site
Like me on Facebook Follow me on Twitter Watch My Videos
April 22nd, 2012Comments Off

It’s not hard to get carried away by the excitement of your first book, first submission, first website. It’s pretty exciting stuff.

But… when approaching agents, publishers or seasoned writers you don’t want to come across as excited as a four year old at a fair. You want them to think of you as relaxed, confident and, above all, professional. Because what they think when they first encounter you will tell them what you’ll be like to work with.

These are ten sure giveaways that you’re new to the game. I made four before I caught on (no, I’m not telling which!) and that’s four ‘first impressions’ I can’t get back.

 

1. (Over)Protecting the Work

On his website, Daniel Lazar,an agent with Writers House tells those considering querying him:

“If you mail, no need to send materials double sealed in bubble wrap. It’s paper, not anthrax.”

Funny but true! Your MS may be precious to you but you don’t want to come across that way to publishers.

If you over-wrap your submission, send it by hand-delivered priority courier, signature-accept or (worse yet) requiring it to be collected from the postal office you might as well write “HIGH MAINTENANCE AUTHOR” on the outside and be done with it.

You’re sending a copy of your work, not the original. Just present it neatly (not bound) inside an appropriate-sized envelope or shipping parcel/box which is safely but modestly taped up and then put your trust in your friendly, neighbourhood postman.

If you’re really anxious to know that it got there in one piece, drop a stamped, self-addressed postcard in the bundle that the receiving officer can simply flick straight into their ‘out’ tray for return post.

 

2. Premature Submission

To a publisher. To an agent. To a competition. To a crit service.

It’s all too easy to be tempted to prematurely submit your work for evaluation just to test its brilliance. I think I waited a day after typing ‘The End’ on my first MS before lobbing it out to God and everyone. In the weeks and months that followed I learned SO MUCH MORE about the craft and the industry and my work change significantly. When the competition feedback forms started rolling in I cringed at the glaring errors in them – stylistic, genre-related and grammatical.

Long time Aussie author, Anna Jacobs,talks about the art of letting it sit on her website where she says:

Most of the unpublished writers I meet are making the same fundamental mistake. They are submitting their manuscripts far too soon – and quite often too soon by a matter of years. In fact, they are still at the enthusiastic amateur stage.

By splashing your unready work all over the industry you risk publishers/agents connecting your name with an inferior product. Particularly if its spectacularly inferior. That will get remembered!

So the how-to-books aren’t kidding when they recommend letting a MS sit for weeks and even months (Anna says at least a year!) while you work on something else. When you go back to it with fresh eyes, you’d be amazed what you find to fix.  Then… after many more sits and many more amazements… you’re ready to submit.

3. Thinking you’re the exception rather than the rule

When publishers or agents go to the trouble of telling you how to format/submit your material, you should follow it to the letter. They wouldn’t ask if they didn’t mean it.

The experts at Edit Torrent say:

…when an author can’t conform to the very few, very simple formatting requirements posted in our submissions guidelines, that makes me worry that they’ll disregard our other instructions.

It is naive to imagine that, somehow, they’ll recognise that you’re different or that your circumstances are a worthy exception to their carefully stated rules. A rule is a rule for a reason. It’s disrespectful to  ignore it or, just as bad, you will come across as high maintenance before you’ve even begun!

 

4. Submitting to the enemy

Anne Mini’s Author, Author! website suggests that:

“…over-eager writers overstep the bounds of common courtesy all the time – and, as I can tell you from direct personal experience, it’s not easy being the first personal contact a writer has with the industry: one tends to be treated less as a person than as a door or a ladder.  And no one, however famous or powerful, likes that.”

Anne’s example focusses on other authors (as in using them to get to agents etc) but the principle applies to agents. They ARE often the first contact point between writers and the industry. It IS easy to think of them as a step-ladder or an obstacle. Or an adversary. You cannot, CANNOT let that kind of attitudinal short-sightedness come through in your pitch.

Recognise that the author/agent relationship is symbiotic, neither adversarial or one-way. They are in the same industry as you are. Your job is to write it. Their job is to sell it. As such, the work you present them is nothing (at first) but a business opportunity. If they fail to exude gratitude at seeing your work its because they see so many hundreds in a month they simply don’t have time to gush. And so dealing with an agent can be (at first) a sparse, bare-bones experience.  That is not always a true reflection of the agent concerned and shouldn’t encourage you to start dealing with agents in a cold, bare-bones fashion. There is no excuse for being abrupt or far-sighted with agents simply because they happen to be your 20th submission. It is not their fault that 19 before them declined to pick up your work.

The agent-securing process is an obstacle (but not insurmountable). The agent themselves are a human being who work in a sliver of the industry that is quite brutal and they would be treated as the enemy every day of the week.  Don’t let your submission reinforce that stereotype.

5. Cause of Death? Over-critting

Author, Melissa James,helpfully said to me once:

“Don’t over-crit your writing. Editors LOVE to edit… It’s why they do it.”

It is possible to crit your work virtually to death, ironing out any trace of individual personality, losing all the nuances that made the story special, conforming to whatever trend is selling this week.

Critting can too easily get bogged down in real line-editing type stuff at the expense of the real value of critting – structural, thematic, story-based aspects.

Which is absolutely not to say that anything you send an editor should still have typos or chronic watch-words in it, but at least leave a trace of YOU in the story.

An editor (or an agent) is far more likely to express interest in a quirky, attention-grabbing story or style with a great plot. Agents, particularly, are looking for something DIFFERENT about you, something marketable.

Clearly, you need to follow the basics of genre requirement but the message is ‘loosen your tie a little’ and let your voice shine through.

 

6. Plagiarise technique (a great learning tool)

Some new writers live in fear of unconsciously plagiarising content or mimicking someone elses style and avoid reading as some kind of safety net.

Don’t.

If you want to get published you should be reading recent, quality works in your genre specifically so you CAN pull them apart to see what makes them so good. You don’t want to adopt plots characters or text, of course, but you do want to adopt good technique. Having said that… if you pitch a work with some terribly obvious, high profile trademark technique in it… that’s gonna get noticed and not in a good way.  Everything in moderation.

 

7. Want syrup with that waffle?

New writers invariably give themselves away by saturating their work with irrelevant waffle. By flooding the reader with background information. By waxing way too poetic. If it doesn’t move the story along or if it doesn’t contribute to the characters development, leave it out. If the present action, dialogue or narrative doesn’t naturallylend itself to a few lines of drip-fed backstory, then chop it. It’s probably not that important.

Closely related to this is being a smart arse in print. Just because you’re clever enough to write a book doesn’t make you cleverer than your readers. Don’t drown your poor reader in the finer details of the history of square dancing just because you happen to know it. If its not relevant to your story then… save it for a marketable non-fiction on the origins of dance.

In fact, even if it is relevant to your story try to be judicious in your application of the specialist knowledge. Do your editor/agent/reader a favour and remember the adage “less is more”.
8. Eggs in one basket

Writing, particularly popular fiction, is a massively competitive arena. Even if you’re good, wading through everyone else and getting yourself noticed is no easy feat. You have a choice as an author to write the book of your heart and focus all your attention and efforts onto it and persevere and persevere until, finally, it lands on the right desk.

Or you can be prolific and churn out a number of manuscripts so that, at any one time, you have several projects on the go (one in development, one you’re writing/editing and one or more ‘out there’ in submission). This spreads your bets and increases your chances of success. The trade off is that it dilutes your focus and may lead to some difficult decisions.

But the surest way to give yourself away as a newbie is to write to a publisher or an agent and say “You’re it for me. This is meant to be.” By all means offer a particular publisher/agent first refusal if its a house you really, really want to get in on. But you better have a backup plan when that refusal comes in.

Because 999 times out of 1000 they will refuse. That’s just the biz.

 

9. Know your target

If you waded through 200 queries/submissions a week, how would you feel about the one that came in addressed (on the envelope and in the covering letter) to the ‘Senior Line Editor’.  Reject pile.

Take ten minutes to google the house’s site and get a name and exact title. And don’t automatically send it to the most senior person you can find (assuming their judgement would somehow be superior). TARGET your pitch as though you were a pro-baseballer. You want that home-run don’t you?

 

10. R.E.S.P.E.C.T

You wanna write? Learn to be a professional. Not a professional in whatever field you’re just leaving, a professional in your new field.

Respect the rules of your new field. It’s been there longer than you.  Bucking the system or trying to out-manouvre it is a sure-fire way of outing yourself as inexperienced.

  • Understand that everyonehas something to learn no matter what their standing in the game.
  • Know that writing is 90% craft and 10% art, just because you’re talented with words does not mean you can automatically craft a good book.
  • Don’t be precious about your work, your goals, or your relative importance in the world. Dreams are good but you have to be realistic about them.
  • Work with the flaws of the industry (critically slow response times, long ponderous approval periods, excruciating competition) rather than fighting the process every step of the way.

This means one followup phone-call/email and no more. This means declaring honestly if you’re shopping your manuscript around to dozens of publishers at the same time (and accepting if some knock you back because of that choice). This means accepting rejection or feedback with grace and maturity. This means thinking three times before you post ANYTHING to a public blog or forum. Your name will be googlable forever. This means taking a step back and a deep breath if you get an unprofessional response from someone working in the industry. That’s on them, not you.

Some days its harder than others to be professional. But its your job to do the hard thing. This is your dream, not theirs.

April 2nd, 2012Comments Off

Being an author is only partly about being a writer. Lots of people who write well, don’t necessarily write well across-the-board. Someone proficient in government report writing may have style-guide perfect grammar but might struggle to write a compelling science fiction novel. An advertising copywriter may have the gift of expression but could struggle to convert that in literary terms.

Yet both are paid to write.

read more »

March 18th, 2012 • No Comments »

My retreat writing space (upstairs balcony)

I thought I’d show you a few pics from my writing retreat in Sydney.  The old heritage house on Cockatoo Island is too big and pricey to stay by yourself, but it’s value really comes into its own when you have 6-8 people to split what is then a very affordable cost. It was large, airy, bright and comfortable and meant that we each had an enormous bed and a (separate) dedicated writing space so that we could concentrate. On top of that were a bunch of shared spaces for winding down.

This was my writing space… The upstairs front balcony (as distinct from the downstairs front verandah and the upstairs back balcony…and the gorgeous window seat in the lounge at the front of the house and the snug study upstairs at the back of the house and the opulent formal lounge with comfy sofas… you get the picture…)

I only left this balcony to sleep, shower or eat. Otherwise I stretched out on the comfy chairs with pillows under my legs, a blanket over me and my keyboard on my lap. It was an amazingly relaxing way to spend a few days. Heaps of interesting activity on the river and below the house to provide temporary distraction from my writing. Mostly the sun shone and the river sparkled and watercraft were active, but even when the clouds moved in and a light, wet mist blew down the river–and even when it finally matured into actual rain–I was warm and dry in my balcony nest.

There was a lovely, green garden and big comfortable outdoor table (hello additional writing space!) which was perfect for late breakfasts or group brainstorming sessions or just sitting and staring up at the rustling jacaranda.

Outdoor dining table in back garden

Side garden view

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24b - the old heritage house on Cockatoo Island, Sydney Harbour

All in all a beautiful and suprising place to visit. Surprising? Cockatoo Island is an old incarceration site and shipyard and 75% of the island is concrete. It’s the last place you might imagine yourself going for a quiet writing retreat. But from inside this house, sitting as we were high on the cliff face with most of the island ‘behind’ us you wouldn’t know. All that granite does something amazing to sound transfer; in fact there was a 6 hour function for 750ppl in one of the giant echo-ey factory sheds on the island about 300m away and we didn’t even hear them. The only clue we had of them even being there was the all day back-and-fro barges which ferried the equipment and catering vans etc across right in front of us.

As for the heading of this blog? On the second last night on the island, Sydney had what they described as a ‘deluge’ in the harbour. It apparently rained for so long and so hard that harbour properties were flooded and overrun.  I do remember waking to the sound of thundering rain during the night but our gentle old girl of a house took it in her stride (sitting up on her cliff face) and barely groaned. The only thing pouring on that trip were words on the page…

I slept, there, the best I can remember ever sleeping–deep, dreamless and high quality–in that modest old house’s loving care.

So thank you Sydney for the loan of one of your many old mysteries. and thanks Cockatoo Island for showing me a side to Sydney I’d never seen. I hope to be back.

xx

Categories:
March 4th, 2012 • No Comments »

It may surprise you to know… a whole lot of writing.

Next week I have four days retreat with fellow Harlequin authors Rachel Bailey, Bronwyn Jameson and Claire Baxter in an old heritage cottage overlooking Sydney Harbour. Far from being a retreat from writing, this is a retreat to write. Intensively. No family, no work, no phones, no noisy neighbours’ alarm going off every two hours.  Far from home which means we can all focus on our writing. Or plotting. Or brainstorming.

You may recall my last one was to a lighthouse on a far-flung corner of Tasmania. Just us, the lighthouse keeper, and the handful of tourists who made it out that far each day. This one is much more urban but hopefully just as peaceful. It’s raining right now in Sydney – a lot. This means less views but also less tourists and noise. I’m hoping we can just hunker down in our heritage house, listen to the rain hit the roof and the words hit the page.

Sigh.

I’ll be able to blog from there, though (unlike the previous retreat which had no internet connection), but will be all virtuous and try not to be online too often.

So… if you were thinking of running your own writers’ retreat here’s what you need…

1. Writing friends – preferably all of a similar level of ‘grown-up-ness’

2. Somewhere to retreat to. Doesn’t have to be all that flash. Just private.

3. Good food, moderate treats

4. Multiple comfortable writing places for inspiration/separation

5. TV for nightly non-writing activities (“North & South” and the BBC “Pride & Prejudice” are on our list)

6. Dealine optional.

 

Categories:
January 27th, 2012 • No Comments »

 

This phrase gets bandied around—a lot—in writing circles. We all know that the big six are a core group of publishers who’ve held the power in publishing for a long time. We know they’re all based in NY city. We know they’re all now scrabbling for their lives to ensure they stay relevant—and dominant—in the face of the e- and self-publishing revolution.

But exactly who are they?

  • Simon & Schuster – Pocket Books; Touchstone; Fireside; (and others)
  • Hachette Book Group (USA) – Little Brown & Co; Grand Central
  • Harper Collins – Avon; Harper Mass Market/Paperback/One/Business; William Morrow.
  • Bertelsmann AG – Random House; Ballantine; Bantam Dell; DelRay; Doubleday (and heaps of others)
  • Penguin Group (USA) – Penguin; Berkley; (Putnam, Signet, Viking, Plume, Grosset, Ace, Tarcher, Dutton, Penguin Press, Pedigree, Portfolio)
  • McMillan US – St Martin’s Press; Henry Holt & Co; Farrar, Straus & Giroux

If the list wasn’t so US-centric it might also include Harlequin Enterprises which has its headquarters in Toronto, Canada.

Or I might just be biased ;)

January 24th, 2012 • No Comments »

I have a new book out. Yay!! I haven’t had a book out since July which–for me–is a really long time. That’s what I get for having four releases in six months last year!
My latest release actually started two years ago when I wrote ‘Their Newborn Gift’ – a story in which the heroine needs the father of her (secret) child to help save its life. Actually that’s out this month, too, in Australia in an anthology with two other ‘bestselling Australian authors’.(Love anything that has my name and the words ‘best’ and ‘selling’ in it. Lord I hope that’s true!)
Anyhoo… back to my latest release. So….
The first draft of ‘Newborn Gift’ originally featured an opening scene in which the heroine was walking into a remote hospital to undergo an embryo transfer, impregnating herself with her sister’s babies.
That premise didn’t work for that story and so I put it in my ‘come back later’ file, but the idea never left me. It would emerge at the worst possible moments–when I was supposed to be concentrating on another story–and jump up and down demanding my focus.
And so I finally gave it the attention it craved and–ever willing to do its own part–my subconscious had half-written the story in the interim.  And so the premise was born: a woman who has fought the courts to be allowed to implant her (dead) sister and brother-in-law’s embroys inside her in order to keep them in the family. The mystery brother who appears, still dusty from the outback to throw a spanner in the works. And the only reasonable solution to a situation in which possession really is nine-tenths of the law…?
Marriage of convenience.

My first MOC story and I didn’t even intend for it to go that way. I thought I was writing a virgin-birth hook. What did I know! My subconscious had it all in hand. So there I was, happily describing the awful scene in the hospital in which the hero slaps a legal injunction on the heroine to prevent the embryo transfer and suddenly he blurts out the short-term solution to their legal problem. Even he didn’t see it coming.

If she has the disputed babies inside her (possession) then he would equal the playing field by keeping them (and therefore, her) with him on a property in the highlands of Australia until the courts had finished hashing it out.

Well…alright then! Their Miracle Twins was born.

Cue fabulous Aussie setting, cue gorgeous family, cue deception. My poor heroine who is so starved for a loving family… the moment she finds one it’s not one she can keep.  Same with the hero, the moment she finds a man she might love, he’s only in it for the embryos.

I’ve learned not to argue with my subconscious in life. It’s almost always right.

So I don’t know why I don’t trust it more in my writing. Clearly it has a plan!

 

Categories:
January 19th, 2012Comments Off

Time is like sex. We all think everyone else has more of it and that it’s somehow better quality than the sex we have.

Well, just like sex, they’re not.

Ultimately, everyone has the same number of hours in the day to work with and everyone has conflicting uses for that time. Some people are fantastic time-managers and they seem to wring productive blocks of time out of nowhere. Others struggle to arrange their day so that the essential tasks get done, let alone the luxuries.

read more »

January 1st, 2012 • No Comments »

The purpose of subtext in fiction—just like in life—is to add meaning to your story and to what is happening on the page. A novel devoted to the exploration of a romantic relationship (romance) therefore needs multiple layers of subtext to ensure that it adds as much meaning as possible. Subtext, then, becomes an author tool to help make your scenes and dialogues work harder for your story.

Dialogue: Subtext is most literally and commonly recognised to be everything characters are not saying in between what they are saying. Body language during the dialogue (like in life) gives away subtext—to the characters and the reader—and dialogue tags or inner dialogue can reveal the subtext for the reader but not the other character.

So for instance if your heroine is madly trying not to let on that she’s been thinking about the hero since their one night together a year ago you might exploit subtext like this:

Ingrid crossed her slim arms hard across her chest making herself into a human bullet. ‘You think I lie awake at night wondering what went wrong between us, Gabe?’

Strength had its downside. But he was a Marque and well-practiced at not reacting to sarcasm. He half-smiled. ‘I would be a fool to imagine that.’

And so it was official. His father was right; he was l’imbecile.

The heroine might be saying that she hasn’t given him much thought since  they last met but her body language tells us (and him) that she’s defensive  about it and therefore probably not being totally honest. That’s subtext.

Similarly, the hero’s half-smile tells us a lot about the next thing he says (‘I would be a fool to imagine that.’). In other words he had imagined that,  in his weaker moments, and despises that about himself. As humans and  readers we decode a half-smile as being deprecating, so it adds that tone to  what he’s actually saying out loud. Subtext.

And finally (just in case anyone missed the other clues), the hero’s internal dialogue adds confirmation that he was fool enough to think she’d been thinking of him (and some opportunistic backstory about his family relationship for good measure).

In this case the characters may not be heavily conscious of the subtext, but it does start to influence the meaning they take from conversations with each other.

Setting/Mise en scene: If a hero ends a relationship with the heroine over lunch in the middle of a work day it sends a totally different message to the one who breaks up with her the moment they wake the morning after she was chief bridesmaid at her best friend’s wedding. Subtextually, the bedroom setting and the fact she still has the bridesmaid dress hanging on the back of the door adds a whole lot of extra meaning (and ouch) to the breakup scene. And the reader becomes very conscious that no-one’s mentioning the wedding and so it’s probably relevant. So the reader gets a clue about the hero’s commitment issues before the (devastated) heroine thinks it through and long before he realises.

Internal/External conflict: many people say that the external conflict is what the characters believe is going on between them and the internal conflict is what’s *really* going on between them. That makes the entire internal conflict a kind of subtext. It’s the thing driving, changing, and affecting the story without either character (and possibly the reader, at first) knowing it’s there. And it may not be fully revealed/exposed until the resolution.

So the breaking up couple think they’re breaking up over the fact that she’s working for his competitor and he thinks she’s been leaking information (for instance) but what’s really going on is that he’s falling for her and is scared of his emotions because he came from a broken home. So all those traits and foibles can be a kind of subtext.

A story about relationships that doesn’t have any subtext going on would be pretty flat because our real relationships are saturated with subtext all the time and we are sensitive to it without even realising. That makes it a really useful tool for an author to influence the reader’s experience.

And therefore essential.

September 29th, 2011 • No Comments »

The question was asked by someone new on a commercial writer’s loop “what is ‘literary fiction’?” and the best answer (by far) was “What the rest of us support.”

Literary fiction is the top point of the fiction pyramid where fewer authors dwell amongst fewer publishers and even fewer sales (comparably). But it is somewhat hallowed ground. It’s emminently respectable. The rest of the pyramid basically comprises ‘popular’ or ‘commercial’ fiction. Yep, it’s what people buy. Sci-fi, fantasy, who-dunnits, love stories, historicals, Young Adult, erotic fiction. And each brings with it a varying degree of credibility.

Signing up with HMB, I realised that any media/PR activities would lead, inevitably, to dealing with those sticky anti-romance questions that are such fun to negotiate. So I jotted a few romance myths down to tackle in anticipation. As I looked around, I found lots of other authors who have almost identical lists of anti-romance sentiment.

And I actually felt encouraged.

This means the criticism is generally finite. Maybe people have run out of things to knock if we’re starting to repeat ourselves. There are some very good analyses of romance bashing on the websites of authors Anne Gracie and Jenny Crusie should you care to go for something a little more cerebral than my ‘cop that’ approach.

The Myths

  • Anyone can write a romance
  • You’ll get rich writing romance
  • Romance novels are ‘formulaic’
  • All Romance novels are ‘Mills & Boons’
  • All romances are ‘bodice rippers’
  • Romance is ‘chick porn’
  • All romances are variations on the same theme
  • Reading romance means you’re uneducated, unfulfilled or unenlightened
  • Romance disempowers women

 

Myth 1: Anyone can write a romance (or why novels are like sperm)

Novels are like sperm — a heck of a lot are produced but, statistically, only one or two individuals actually get to the big fertilisation pay-off — or publication, in our case.

Sperm immediately separate into clusters. The front-runners (the fastest, healthiest, longest-tailed which are biologically customised perfectly for their very specialised function) cluster up front forging a direct path to their goal. The other, less motivated, shorter-tailed, kinked ones drop back to proceed at a more leisurely pace and most eventually perish before they get anywhere near their eggie-goal. Meanwhile, back up front…the sperm, quite literally, are tripping over each other in their race to fertilise. There is some speculation that clustering causes competition (even though they’re most likely all from the same male) and, thus, evolutionarily ensures that only the primo sperm wriggle their way to the front of the pack. Survival of the fittest starts early.

Okay so that’s where it starts to deviate from being like novels. It is not true to say that the role of many novels in the marketplace is to engender healthy competitions. If a novel is swimming out there in the big publication fallopian tube then it really wants to be there. You don’t go to that kind of trouble if you’re not goal oriented.

But that intensive clustering, that massive over-supply, does generally mean that the books need to be highly specialised, highly customised for their purpose to succeed. It’s why perfectly well written, perfectly interesting, perfectly presented books may never sell.  Because another book was just custom-fitted better to a particular line or genre. Some people are born customisers, others work hard to learn it.

Please can I get to my point..? Okay.

“Anyone can write a romance novel?” Sure they can, and good luck to every one of them. But can they sell one?

Writing a novel is reasonably straight-forward. Writing a ‘good’ novel (defined here as being appropriate for the genre, engaging, technically correct and able to scramble over the rotting corpses of those that came before it) is less so.

The odds of being published in romance are, statistically, higher than the odds of being a successful sperm but some days it doesn’t feel like it. Harlequin Mills & Boon–the largest publisher of romance but hardly alone with tens of dozens of other major publishers in the marketplace many of whom include romance–receives around 20,000 unsolicited manuscripts each year, this is in addition to the working pool of authors or agented authors who submit story ideas on an ongoing basis. With maybe 20 of the 500 slots each year that aren’t already filled by existing authors, this means your chances of getting published by the market leader are 1000:1   Doable, but no gimme. Other publishers are possibly even higher, particularly considering you can’t get close to most publishers without and agent or a previous publishing credit.

This is not to say that plenty of diverse, interesting, engaging romance novels aren’t languishing unpublished out there in author-land and that those novels aren’t perfectly good works of fiction. It’s possible for someone to win twenty competitions (or more) with a manuscript and still not to be able to sell it. It’s technically perfect but just lacks the X-factor that makes an editor stand up and take notice. Or it hasn’t hit the right editor yet. Or it would sell in a flash if in the hands of a savvy agent who knew their industry.

Editors try to hedge their sales-bets. They create diversity in their stable of authors to increase the chances of providing a book that’s just right for every reader. That’s why there’s so many lines with so many different themes (everything from faith-related through to erotica).

 

Myth 2: You’ll get rich writing romance (or why you shouldn’t give up your day job)

Erm…no.

Not unless your name ends in Roberts, Cartland or Steele. Like any industry there are those who are at the apex and there are many, many more shuffling around for space at the fatter end of the pyramid. Romance is massive business around the world but it’s important to understand, first, how many people are writing in the industry and, second, where the money from every sale goes.

Authors, retailers, agents and designers get a percentage of everything sold but nothing on what doesn’t sell. Even publisher profits are offset by the cost of producing books that are returned, unsold, for pulping. Every book that does well has to carry its neighbours that don’t.

But the print industry… Printers get paid for 100% of the 100 million books produced every year.  Regardless of what ships, regardless of what sells, regardless of what is returned for pulping. So when I die I’m coming back as a print company share-holder.

 

Myth 3: Romance novels are formulaic (a computer could write one)

The presence of structural literary convention does not make a story formulaic. The basic structure of a novel meeting the definition of ‘romance’ is to have the hero and heroine form the central plot in the story, include growing tension between the characters, a ‘black moment’ (or climactic event) and a ‘happy ever after’ or optimistic ending.  The equivalent ‘formula’ in a different genre might be the importance of introducing your protagonists early in a mystery novel, drip-feeding clues to the reader throughout the novel and then having the ‘who-dunnit’ or ‘reveal’ at the end of the story. These are all non-negotiable in meeting reader expectation.

Early romance novels, particularly those published by Mills & Boon, were considered formulaic in that they created content to meet a specific market demand. At the time, the market demanded sweet, vulnerable heroines and dashing, powerful heroes. However the genesis of the formula label may lie in the fact that Mills & Boon were the first publisher to create specificationsfor its authors regarding style, content and layout of submissions. This practice is now a publishing industry standard across most genres. Additionally there are publishing production values that establish lengths (in the 70s most M&B novels were precisely 192 pages long for production reasons) which flow on to the manner and speed with which the stories unfold. When you have just 192 pages to tell your story, you really want your protagonists on the page together as quickly as possible, for instance.

Modern romances continue to address reader expectation and changing tastes. Today’s romance heroines are more commonly feisty or kick-butt and more than a match for their heroes no matter how alpha. Story scopes range from wildly escapist themes with millionaires, sheiks and vampires to it could happen to youcontemporary stories with flawed, everyday characters from the suburbs.

Author Jane Ann Krentz put it into clear context when she said

“It wasn’t that long ago that mysteries were denounced as trashy reads. They appeared almost exclusively in cheap paperback editions. Their covers were lurid and provocative with lots of bosomy women and tough-looking men with five o’clock shadows and dashing trench coats. The books were accused of being formulaic and predictable. Reviewers ignored them. Educated people did not want to be seen reading them in public.”

Sound familiar? Today, mysteries are the fourth highest grossing genre pulling in $650 million in 2007. What’s the highest..? Romance–$1.37billion in the same period.  www.rwanational.org/cs/the_romance_genre/romance_literature_statistics

 

Myth 4: All romances are a Mills & Boon

This is a bit like saying ‘every cola is a Coke™ ‘. Many suppliers–not the least Pepsi™ –are likely to disagree. A romance is simply defined by the placement of a developing relationship between two people at the core of the story and a ‘happy ever after’; not by its length, subject matter or traits.

The fact is ‘category’romance (shorter, line-driven series with fixed shelf lives and massive turnover) is the single biggest type of romance published (40% in 2006). Harlequin Mills & Boon have made a speciality out of publishing and marketing category romance, and pretty much owns that 40% as a result (in 1985 HMB bought out its only serious competitor, US Silhouette Books, effectively creating a monopoly). The next closest sub-genre in popularity is single-title historical romance at 17%.

But ‘romance’ comes in all shapes, sizes and levels of intensity. They have been produced in Manga,  Braille, audio and e-formats with novels as long as 250,000 words or novellas as short as 10,000 words. Sub-genres include paranormal, historical, fantasy, intrigue/mystery, faith-based/inspirational, medical, romantic comedy. Additionally there are other genres that have ‘romantic elements’. These aren’t classed as true ‘romances’ but they have some of the traits of a romance.

There are thousands of romances that are not ‘a Mills & Boon’ but it certainly is true that millions more ARE. This is because Harlequin Enterprises is now a super-corporation which owns the three major ‘category’ novel producers – Mills & Boon, Harlequin and Sillhouette. Some studies put their sales at five-and-a-half books every second, globally (2007).

 

Myth 6: Romance novels are ‘chick porn’

The 1972 release of Kathleen Woodiwiss’ “The Flame and the Flower” (AVON) is generally agreed to have revolutionised the romance industry for two reasons – by taking the ‘action’ beyond the bedroom door for the first time and by being released in soft-cover straight up. Following the success of this first release, AVON flogged over eight million copies of Woodiwiss and another romance author’s books in three years. These single-titles fed the flames for more passionate, ground-breaking historical romance showing that sexual expression was in great demand amongst readers.

Literally, romance is distinguished from pornography by the inclusion of a relationship between two people as central to the story. Without the romance, the story would fall over. Pornography is all about sexual titlation and without THAT a pornographic story wouldn’t stand up (in fact the story is often very flimsy without the sex).

But when people criticise romance as ‘female porn’ I think they’re being less literal.  What they’re talking about is the arousal (emotional or physical) that romance can generate.  A good romance is full of what is called ‘emotional punch’, it’s what gets your heart hammering and makes your breath catch and has you staying up late to see how it will resolve. Most often that’s about something emotional that happens (or doesn’t) between characters rather than something sexual.  But romance lines with higher levels of sexual expression may also elicit a physical arousal in some readers. The best of those lines elicit both an emotional and sexual arousal.

Readers in other popular genres become just as aroused by literary devices like suspense, horror or mystery and some of these may also include sex. Sex has a role to play in increasing engagement but it is not the primary device.

Just like in the romance genre.

Romantic erotica takes the genre to the sexual extreme but still does not cross over into ‘porn’ territory, when skilfully delivered. Yes, there’s plenty that isn’t but, when done well, erotic romance arouses the reader on two levels — a psychological engagement and a physical engagement.  But pull the sex out of a well-written erotic romance and the story will still hold up.

 

Myth 7: All romances are variations on the same theme

Contemporary romances have a massive amount of story scope compared with their earliest cousins but it has been said that ‘There are no new stories in the world’. It is certainly true that some themes appear more commonly in romance–cinderella, beauty and the beast, ugly duckling type stories; hidden/unexpected child stories; forced proximity (desert island) stories.  The themes are popular with readers and there are no end to the number of stories one can weave around a popular theme.

However some subjects are still on the ‘no’ list for 99% of authors. Controversial issues such as warfare (including terrorism), politically ‘hot’ issues, or social issues that will date (such as stock market crashes, diseases etc) are generally discouraged.   As markets shift different types of story become difficult to sell — stories featuring artists, actors or sports stars have in the past been discouraged. Don’t ask me why, they sound like perfectly interesting people to me and it’s hard to buy the arguement that readers don’t find ‘hollywood’ stories realistic when they’re buying millionaire/sheik stories by the container-load. But I assume they don’t sell.

That our heroes and heroines are moral, decent, likeable people is important regardless of what story they are packaged in. This is because as readers we want to be able to relate to our heroines and fall in love with our heroes.

The general consensus is that if the writer is skilled they can breach convention and possibly get away with it. But one non-negotiable rule is that the hero must not be ‘unheroic’ and the heroine in conventional romance should demonstrate positive values — she might be a stripper to support her disabled child but never to support her drug habit. A hero may kill adult humans for a living (ie: a reformed assassin, a soldier) but if he kills fluffy animals it would not be well-received by contemporary readers.  Romance Author Anne Gracie says that ‘there’s something important and valuable’ that women are getting from fantasies involving scenarios of sexual dominance and so stories with extremely dominant males overpowering the woman sexually still appear commonly, although the kind of aggressive, forced sexual relations that might have typified romances in the 50s and 60s–where a forced context was a convenient way to get your characters together sexually in a cultural context of women who weren’t sexually liberated–is a big no-no these days.

In the case of romance giant Harlequin Mills & Boon, they bundle these story ‘types’ together carefully under tightly marketed lines so a reader knows what kind of story they will get just by picking up the latest title in their favourite lines.  If a reader likes dashing princes, brooding businessmen and arrogant Sheiks then they look for a Silhouette Desire or a Harlequin Presents. If they want a more true-to-life story with storylines more closely aligned with ‘real world’ and very emotionally intense storylines they migth look for a Harlequin Romance or a Silhouette Special Edition. For fuller sexual expression and hip story-lines they might look for a Harlequin Modern Heat or a Harlequin Blaze.

And since most journalists or speculators are drawn like moths to a flame to the more glamourous, exotic, fantastic lines (hey, just like readers!) their view of romance tends to be skewed heavily.

 

Myth 8: Reading romance is a sign that you’re uneducated, unfulfilled or unenlightened

Harlequin Mills & Boon’s annual romance report says that

“the image of the dissatisfied housewife devouring romance novels is not, and never has been, true of the majority of the genre’s readership.”

For a start, approximately 9% are men. Two-thirds of romance readers graduated high-school or college and nearly 60% entered the workforce (full or part-time).

Prolific romance best-seller, Marian Keyes, is bothered by criticisms about readers of romance saying,

“it’s just another way of making women feel shit about themselves, by making fun of the books they write and read and the issues in them. If they were a group of men writing thrillers who had the same impact around the world they’d be celebrated.”

Of the $6.31 billion net revenue from US publishing retail sources in 2006, romance accounted for 21% of overall sales ($1.37billon), second only to religious/inspirational sales (and including the sales of The Bible). The following year when they took the Bible out of the race, Romance topped the chart by a mile. Romance’s nearest commercial competitor was the science fiction/fantasy leviathan which, although it had the much bigger public profile (and probably double or treble the unit cost further skewing the dollar-based stats), accounted for just under $500 million.

There are other clues to the mass popularity of romance amongst readers, 161 authors with 288 titles dominated the best-seller list in 2006. And did I mention the 64 million readers who read at least one romance in 2004?

That’s a lot of unenlightened, unfulfilled and uneducated readers spending a LOT of money on their sad little habit.

The fact is that there is nothing unenlightened about enjoying stories that celebrate love or relationships. And if you’re reading a romance, you’re ahead of the estimated 27% of Americans (for instance) who didn’t (or couldn’t) read one single book in 2007 (AP-Ipsos poll 2007). So that’s a big tick in the ‘educated’ box. And unfulfilled? Well, have a chat to the behemoth that is the Romantic film industry. Adding a little vicarious romantic pleasure to your day does not a sad, pathetic loser make. It just means you like to feel good.

 

Myth 9: Romance novels disempower women

Rubbish. Not modern romance. Back in the bad old days maybe… Read something current, people!!

Depending on what line or sub-genre you like to read there will be different levels of empowerment shown.  Suspense/intrigue is chock-a-block with women working equally with (or sometimes senior to) a male character in resolving a crime or mystery.  Harlequin Blaze and most erotic romance places women very much in control of the sexual encounters and if they’re not its consensual dominance. Contemporary romances of the ‘sweeter’ variety are often full of challenges being faced, met and overcome by heroines who range from quietly strong to downright kick-butt. And the onus is on character development so that, if a female character is too passive or lets people walk all over her, by the end of the story she’s learned how to stand tall.

These are all important messages. Even in the sub-genre that seems to get people’s equity bells ringing–wildly fantastic and passionate type scenarios involving exotic locations, millionaires, sheiks or other highly alpha males–the heroine is the one person capable of bringing that dominant man to his knees. He may bully everyone else but he ultimately fails to dominate his heroine because she’s more than a match for him.

This last type of category romance is often held up for scrutiny (along with some sub-sub-genres of historical romance) as portraying negative messages for readers. But when readers select those two sub-genres, they are actively choosing escapism. They’re choosing fantasy. And they know it. The number of readers who might think that they actually could end up pressed tightly against a dashing sheik riding cross the desert if only she could be employed as the nanny to his Australian nephews..? I don’t think so.

On the contrary…some lines of romance (particularly contemporary) deal very directly and positively with social issues that affect young (and not so young) women. Real-life issues like eating disorders, disability, psychological issues, broken families, infertility, fidelity, adoption and loyalty form the supporting framework for many romances. They provide a private and safe way for some young women to first be exposed to the issues, the values and the emotions. It gives new readers time to examine their own values and form new ones.

The role of women in society today is more complex than ever. Women lead demanding, stressful lives and they need some escapism. If they choose to take that mental and social break by tumbling into the engaging, fantastic, or diverting pages of a good romance then where’s the harm? At worst we’ve entertained them.

At best we’ve changed them.